New '08 Road Runner..

General Mopar Related Conversation

Moderator: Site Administrators

Post Reply
User avatar
gionni
GTX (RS)
Posts: 183
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 10:19 am
Location: Zurich (Switzerland)

New '08 Road Runner..

Post by gionni » Tue Feb 27, 2007 3:03 am

...this is my interpretation of a new roadrunner for 2008...
the ideally daily-driver... 8)

Image

the base-picture was this '08 challenger...

Image
"PRO RUNNER" 1971 Road Runner Pro Touring (GY9 Tawny Gold)
Image
AERODYNAMIC IS FOR PEOPLE THAT CAN'T BUILD ENGINES!

User avatar
rr6pak
GTX (RS)
Posts: 1007
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 10:29 pm
My Cars: 1971 Tor-Red RR
Location: USA

Post by rr6pak » Tue Feb 27, 2007 5:04 am

COOOOOOOLLLLL!!!!!!!!!!!
I'd buy one

User avatar
mopar71
GTX (RS)
Posts: 1108
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 11:55 pm
My Cars: 1971 roadrunner
Location: Milford,PA

Post by mopar71 » Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:33 pm

I like the concept,to bad it will never have a roadrunner bird on it, they probably will not want to pay the royalties for the bird.
MOPAR (Move Over Plymouth Approching Rapidly)

User avatar
fourforty6pac
GTX (RS)
Posts: 441
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:37 am
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Post by fourforty6pac » Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:48 pm

thats sweet. I would order one today if they made them. I could finally have a hemi road runner. I know that the 71 and 2's are the best runner body style, but the first generation bird are probably the ones that most people know by sight because they are more common. Alot of people ask me what kind of car it is when they see mine. I had one guy ask me what year my chevelle is. So I think that if they made the runner again it would look more like those older birds. If I had a ton of cash I would build it myself, but I dont think they would let me call it a road runner.
Nice art work gionni!

User avatar
1972RM23
GTX (RS)
Posts: 824
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2004 10:01 am
Location: Oviedo, Fl

Post by 1972RM23 » Tue Feb 27, 2007 11:42 pm

SWEEEEET!!!!
I'd buy one!
1972 Road Runner N96 EV2
Image

Post Reply