Page 2 of 2
Re: Wait, this isn't RM23N1G161547!
Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 7:04 pm
by 71_bronze_gtx
Wait, wait, Bruce? You had SN 161547? I have RS23U1G161449. Less than 1 day apart. The fender tag and broadcast sheet were both lost. Do you know what your build date was?
Re: Wait, this isn't RM23N1G161547!
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 7:55 pm
by bruce
This help?
Re: Wait, this isn't RM23N1G161547!
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 9:53 pm
by 71_bronze_gtx
It will after I decode it.. Thanks.
Re: Wait, this isn't RM23N1G161547!
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 10:19 pm
by bruce
December 17, 1970 build date...
Re: Wait, this isn't RM23N1G161547!
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 9:36 am
by 71_bronze_gtx
Yes, getting dangerously close to the holiday shutdown, where workmanship sometimes became shoddy. In my case, who could tell after 45 years and a half-assed cosmetic resto.
Anyone else have or know of a St. Louis serial number close to 161449?
Re: Wait, this isn't RM23N1G161547!
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 9:30 am
by bruce
Did you see my buddy's thread about his orange Satellite (Satalot)? That car is 160064 and has a December 14, 1970 build date. So obviously these cars are all within days of each other.
Re: Wait, this isn't RM23N1G161547!
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 1:39 pm
by 1carcrazyguy
bruce wrote:And along comes this to make things even more interesting... I've always wanted an EV2 car.
And notice how close this Satellite was to the old Road Runner!
I could hook you up with an EV2/White top, white interior car. It is a bucket seat, console shift, 383-2 car. But low mileage and pretty much all original. Or if you want a B5 rubber bumper 383-4 car, I could help there as well.....