72 AirGrabber?

aerodynamic · Post by **aerodynamic** » Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:32 am

Is this really an AirGrabber car?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1972-Ply ... dZViewItem

Smellslike1974 · Post by **Smellslike1974** » Sat Nov 24, 2007 12:17 pm

I love how out of all of the pics he avoids the hood...hmmmm

mopar71 · Post by **mopar71** » Sat Nov 24, 2007 1:23 pm

I love the high res pics,

Smellslike1974 · Post by **Smellslike1974** » Sat Nov 24, 2007 1:29 pm

lol there is defently something fishy about that...but hmm ebay? oh thats why!

1bluegtx · Post by **1bluegtx** » Sat Nov 24, 2007 1:34 pm

Whats fishy about it.It shows the airgrabber and if it has n96 on the fender tag then its an airgrabber car.

BRIAN

Smellslike1974 · Post by **Smellslike1974** » Sat Nov 24, 2007 3:53 pm

Who takes pictures like that though?Its just weird thats out,im not doubting it just dont understand why..

1972RM23 · Post by **1972RM23** » Sat Nov 24, 2007 5:14 pm

It looks ok to me ... no picture of the "legable fender tag" though.
The painted bumpers are goofy as is the black engine bay.
The two tone orange/black seats are a 1971 option (nice fix on the rear seat back huh).
I would love to own this car but is needs some work to make it correct.

rr6pak · Post by **rr6pak** » Sat Nov 24, 2007 7:02 pm

This guy shows the hood...Yeah, the pix are not real good. As far as the rear seat, it looks like he just put them on or something. I think who ever put them on, should've pulled the wrinkles out more. Maybe sit it in the sun would help but not all of the wrinkles.
As far as the N96, I'd have to look at the fender tag, broadcast sheet, and the rad. cowl to make sure it is truly a N96 car.
I love the color combo

Since my car is the same...LOL